- SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS LICENSE
- SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS SERIES
- SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS FREE
At issue in this case is the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act, a 2003 law empowering the secretary of education to waive or modify student loan terms during emergencies. The court will decide whether the Biden administration had authority to forgive student loans for millions of borrowers due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS FREE
Members of the LGBTQ community should be free to access goods and services with the same dignity and respect afforded to everyone. Such a ruling could open the door for businesses to use artistic freedom, among other claims, as an excuse to discriminate against the LGBTQ community and other historically disadvantaged groups.īusinesses must operate under the framework of anti-discrimination laws and serve all customers equally, regardless of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.
SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS LICENSE
If the court sides with the website owner, businesses could wield so-called claims of free speech as a license to discriminate, undermining laws that prevent discrimination in public accommodations. Lower courts found the owner violated state law that requires businesses to offer the same services to everyone, regardless of sexual orientation. The case involves a Colorado website design company owner who refused to design websites for same-sex marriages, citing her free speech rights. The Supreme Court is considering whether businesses have a First Amendment right to refuse certain services to same-sex couples. Giving businesses a license to discriminate A Congress that looks like America gives people the confidence that they have a true voice in government and these lawmakers are more likely to address the needs of their constituents. This year, 25 percent of congressional lawmakers are people of color-a record high-compared with 40 percent of the United States. The country has made incredible progress over the past six decades in making Congress more diverse. If the justices water down the meaning of the Voting Rights Act to prevent states from taking race into account when drawing districts, it will render the law toothless and likely lead to fewer Black members in Congress. Alabama’s radical claim that its map is race-neutral is just a subterfuge for discrimination. Now, the Supreme Court could reverse that decision, despite the fact that carving up Alabama’s Black Belt communities-historically Black areas in the state-to dilute Black voting power is exactly the kind of discriminatory impact the law was designed to prevent. That’s a textbook violation of the law, and a three-judge panel ordered the state to redraw the districts. But last year, Alabama lawmakers drew a congressional map with only one majority-Black district out of seven in a state where 27 percent of the electorate is Black. Section 2 of the act requires voting districts to be drawn in a way that does not unfairly dilute the voting power of racial minorities.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly diluted the Voting Rights Act over the past decade, and the latest case could open the door for states to further marginalize Black voters. Notably, in the case of abortion and affirmative action, the Supreme Court agreed to consider reversing long-standing precedents even though there was no split among lower courts. The court seems to be rushing to reverse established precedent as fast as it can, taking procedural shortcuts to hear cases more quickly and using its shadow docket more often to halt lower-court rulings and block government action. The high court’s lurch to the right has only accelerated in recent years, particularly after the confirmation of three justices appointed by former President Donald Trump. And it could strike down the Biden administration’s student debt relief program, which would have damaging financial consequences for millions of Americans. It could give its stamp of approval to a fringe legal theory that would let state legislatures subvert elections without any chance of court review.
SUPREME COURT LATEST DECISIONS VOTING RIGHTS SERIES
Supreme Court, dominated by a radical right-wing majority, is again poised to issue a series of decisions that could erode long-held rights and cause lasting damage to our democracy.Ī year after overturning the constitutional right to abortion, the court over the next month could turn back the clock on voting rights, LGBTQ rights, and decades of progress in diversifying higher education.
0 kommentar(er)
